Mac versus pc vs linux

Wasabi is a privacy oriented Bitcoin wallet and we have very limited information on our customers. However we upload our releases to GitHub, thus we have some statistics on what kind of users are downloading our software through somsubhra. Our latest release was downloaded on Windows 1, times, the Linux release times and our OSX release times. What does Git log when the sofware is downloaded with Tor Browser? One interesting thing we noticed from the website that Linux users took over OSX users only after we released the.

Windows users are silent majority. Although this can be frustrating at times. This is strange, because again, they are the majority. Or they are just afraid of Windows-shaming? Overall I am quite happy having them around.

The Differences Between Mac, Windows, and Linux

OSX users are the best. They are just as inexperienced as our Windows users, but they care to follow up and assisting us until their issues are resolved. Unfortunately they are not as precise and technically competent in helping us with the debugging, but they are trying and I can really appreciate that. What I like about them, despite being the smallest group, OSX users are extremely active on social media, which is a huge plus, especially that we did not do any marketing whatsoever since our release half a year ago.

Linux users are the best and the worst at the same time. They are the best, because they are the most likely to contribute with valuable and real work to our open source project, but they are the worst, because as all junior cross platform developer has to quickly and painfully realize: there is no such a thing as Linux. Even worse: various releases of the same distribution often fail in this matter, too.

Unfortunately for us fortunately for the specific distros Linux users have great pride in their distribution and they are willing to go to extremes to make sure Wasabi will properly work on their preferred distros. You may have a hard-and-fast budget, or you may have a key need. As you work your way through your choices, keep these factors and the balance between them in mind. Let's talk Windows. Windows went through a rough period during its Windows 8 generation. Microsoft removed the Start menu, forcing users to rely on gestures to find features and launch applications.

Microsoft also introduced a limited version of Windows called Windows RT , which only allowed Windows Store apps and didn't run on the Intel platform. Three years later, in , Microsoft introduced Windows 10 , a substantially improved version of Windows that returned the Start menu. Microsoft improved the user interface, streamlined many of the settings, and eliminated the odd inconsistencies that had haunted Windows 8. Windows 10, which has had some substantial interim upgrades, is a truly strong Windows release.

By most accounts, Windows runs on roughly 90 percent of PCs worldwide, with desktop Linux usage accounting for a very low single digit percentage of usage and MacOS making up the rest. In developed markets like the US, the Mac percentage is considerably higher, at around 20 percent. But corporate usage, with the exception of some companies like IBM, is almost all Windows. For most people, Windows is the default choice.

In fact, choice is Windows' outstanding feature. No matter what kind of computer you want, what configuration, or what form-factor, there's a Windows machine for you. Microsoft has long embraced touch-screen computing with Windows, a feature not found in Macs anywhere. Windows machines are built by hundreds of manufacturers, and users have long built their own machines from easily-available components.

That means if you want a Windows computer that's really a tablet with a detachable keyboard , an all-in-one , a super-beefy tower machine with lots of blinking colored lights , or even a system on a USB thumb drive , along with so many more options, there's a Windows machine for you. When it comes to customization, that choice increases exponentially.

If you want to build a machine yourself, you can add nearly any configuration of cards and features you want. Do you want four beefy graphics cards working in tandem? Windows can do it. Do you want on-board instrumentation inputs? Do you want to be able to run 10 drives internal to the machine? Well, of course, Windows can do it. There are downsides to all this flexibility, of course. Getting all these independently produced components to work together can be challenging.


  • Windows Vs Linux Vs Mac for Dev.
  • fleetwood mac las vegas 2013.
  • Windows vs. Mac OS X vs. Linux: The Operating System Battle!
  • Please review our terms of service to complete your newsletter subscription.;
  • Wrapping Up;

Finding exactly the right mix of drivers that don't conflict with or break each other can often be a hair-pulling experience. But if you're building something this custom, you've probably been down this road before. Most Windows users will buy pre-built laptops where all the drivers generally get along with each other and again, generally have been pre-tested at the factory before shipping. Another big benefit of Windows is cost.

Windows vs Apple vs Linux: Which OS are you?

It'll perform like a dog, but it will run. Because of the vast number of Windows suppliers, product quality can be inconsistent. If you purchase a machine built for a business buyer from a top-tier vendor, you're almost sure to get excellent quality, better components, pre-shipment testing, and long-term support -- at a higher purchase price.

But if you purchase a less expensive machine from a white box reseller or many of the lower-cost off-branded suppliers, component quality, support, and testing can range from unpredictable to downright unavailable. As you might imagine, as the platform with the largest market share, Windows also offers the most applications. When you choose a machine, it's about the apps you need to run. This is a much bigger factor than the operating system or even the cost.

In my experience, the applications on Windows range from excellent to some that are, to be kind, are barely workable. This, of course, is not unique to just Windows, but because there are so many developers, you see a wider range of spotty apps along with a wider range of apps for almost any purpose. To improve on Windows app quality, Microsoft has instituted the Windows Store.

Developer participation is optional, so not all apps are distributed through the Store. That said, Microsoft has been diligent in keeping an eye on quality, eliminating apps that are unsafe for users as they find them. But there's one Windows disadvantage. Because there are so many more Windows users, malware, spyware, and ransomware are far, far more prevalent on Windows than on MacOS or Linux.

The vastly larger total number of potential targets provides a considerably larger return on investment for ransomware and similar attacks. Nearly all breaches, including the vast corporate breaches, are initiated through a phishing or malware attack that gains a foothold on an individual's Windows PC and then makes the jump into a corporate network. For corporate users, Windows-based authentication integrates "out of the box" with Active Directory-based corporate servers.

You can accomplish the same thing with Mac and Linux machines, but you'll need to get extra add-on software to do so. With Windows, corporate networking is built in -- at least as long as you're running the Pro versions. Windows Home does not come with corporate connectivity. There will be an additional upgrade fee.

The Windows Option

For home users, gaming is huge on Windows-based PCs. While there are never-ending debates over whether consoles have more gaming power than beefy gaming PCs, there's no doubt that gaming PCs offer a level of gaming involvement and customization that nothing can top. Not only can Windows PCs be equipped with incredible power, there's also an entire submarket in providing RGB lighting effects for everything from motherboards to memory sticks.

If you're a gamer and you want to get your bling on, nothing beats PC gaming. If you could reach back in time 35 years ago and gently pluck an original Macintosh user from and put her in front of a brand new Mac, she would be able to operate today's machine. The file system would look the same. The menu bar would look the same.

Even the trash would look the same. Sure, instead of just a few thousand black and white pixels, the screens would be in glorious high-resolution color, and the speed, breadth, and depth of the applications would be mind-boggling, but the fundamental interface would be understandable. Macs have undergone fundamental processor changes, jumping from based devices to PowerPCs, migrating to Intel chips, and -- probably in the next few years -- migrating to Apple's own silicon.

But to the users, every single change in how the Mac has evolved has had a level of internal consistency and predictability unrivaled by any other platform. Interestingly, even though some aspects of the system remain effectively unchanged for more than three decades, that doesn't mean that MacOS feels particularly dated, although, as nearly every Mac user will admit, it does have its quirks. Although Macs have historically suffered far fewer malware threats than Windows machines, there has been a small rise in malware variants targeting MacOS users -- mostly for the contents of cryptocurrency wallets.

While it's not as existentially necessary to run an anti-malware program on a Mac, it's generally a good idea. Microsoft has recently starting bringing its Defender software to Macs , but right now, that's limited to enterprise use. We can't discuss MacOS without discussing Macintoshes. The two go together.

While Windows can run on thousands of different machines from hundreds of different vendors, MacOS is distributed by Apple to run solely on Apple hardware. There is a small, intrepid group of Hackintosh builders who source Macintosh compatible hardware and build their own systems , but they're outliers, and the process of building a Hackintosh takes some work.

A common misconception about Macintosh hardware is that it's more expensive than equivalent PC hardware. In fact, that's not true.

Mac vs PC - Which Is Better?

When I compared a highly equipped Mac mini against available PC parts , I was unable to source a PC with anywhere near the capability and size of the Mac mini. Where PCs are cheaper is when you're not looking at brand-name or spec-for-spec comparisons. You can absolutely get cheaper laptops and desktops for Windows than Macs.

Mac OS X: All you need in one dynamite package

Additionally, if you're willing sacrifice the Mac's legendary design and go for a traditional tower Windows PC, you can generally get more performance for the dollar. Although the buy-in cost for Apple hardware is often more expensive, many have found that the overall cost of ownership over the lifetime of the system is less expensive with Macs.

IBM did a study before the company decided to standardize on Macs, where they found that:. PCs drive twice the amount of support calls. They're also three times more expensive. Macs are also appealing because of their design and integration. MacOS is tightly integrated with iOS, to the point that you can even share clipboards between a Mac and an iPhone, or use an iPhone to take a picture that drops directly into a Mac application. Although some Windows users may dispute this, many Mac users believe that MacOS is easier to install and update, offers faster updates with less hassle, and allows applications to be installed and managed with greater ease than Windows.

Out of the box, MacOS also comes with a deep range of applications for free, including the music composition tool GarageBand, video editing application iMovie, and a complete productivity package consisting of Pages word processing and layout , Numbers spreadsheet , and Keynote presentations. While MacOS is often touted as an easy-to-use operating system, it also greatly appeals to design and development professionals.

MacOS also has AppleScript, which can be used to automate complex workflows. If you sufficiently equip your Mac and by this, I mean an i7 processor or better, 16GB of RAM or better, and definitely SSD instead of hard drive , you can use Parallels or another virtualization application to provide multiple operating systems on the Mac. This is a big appeal for me. I use a well-equipped Mac with Parallels, and I'm able to run Windows and Linux side by side with MacOS applications , even dragging and dropping across operating systems.

This level of flexibility is unmatched on any other OS. It's important to note that most Macs can't be upgraded. When you spec out your CPU, memory and storage, that's what you'll have to live with. While the new, Mac mini does allow RAM upgrades , it is a complex, tedious, and delicate process. Other machines, like the insanely expensive iMac Pro , allow RAM to be upgraded, but it requires a highly skilled technician to remove the permanently glued display and case to get at the machine's innards, voiding the warranty in the process..

With a virtualized copy of Windows, a Mac can be used to run any application you might need including Windows and Linux programs , where if you're running on a Windows machine, MacOS applications are not available. Keep in mind, though, that you're limited to the hardware produced by Apple. If Apple chooses not to update a form factor or model for a few years as has happened a lot in recent years , you're out of luck for that hardware unless you decide to build a Hackintosh.

But with the advent of the T2 security chip last year, and the expected move to Apple-designed CPU chips, it may not be possible to home-build a Hackintosh for much longer. I have a Debian distribution running my home server. And in my various home devices, I have an uncountable number of Linux instances running, driving everything from my smart TVs to my Internet router.

Windows vs. Mac OS X vs. Linux: The Operating System Battle - LEENTech Network Solutions

Linux is renowned for its versatility, particularly in servers and embedded solutions. But in this article, we're talking about desktop Linux implementations, where you'd use Linux with a keyboard and mouse to, at the very least, check your email. Because it's open source, it can be modified and extended by anyone; a virtual army of loosely affiliated coders have been working on it for nearly 30 years.


  1. calculate correlation coefficient excel mac.
  2. quarkxpress 7.3 free download for mac?
  3. OS Showdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows!
  4. mac mascara and eyeliner 2 in 1?
  5. multi touch monitor mac compatible.
  6. Also because it's open source, different variants called distributions have been released, containing everything from different core functionality to a wide variation of settings and configuration options, to different user interfaces, and even different fundamental purposes. One reason many of the Linux faithful flock to the operating system is because it's not controlled by Microsoft or Apple. This can be something of a political preference or it can be a practical one: The desire or need to customize an OS at a level not permitted by a corporate overlord. For our desktop comparison though, let's focus on the truly practical.